Add to ORKGFrom a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration in the UK in order to make a proposal on the nature and representation of “conductive” argumentation, arguing it should not be viewed as a single argument, but in relation to deliberation as genre. There is no “conductive argumentation”, only various possible outcomes of deliberation, seen as critical testing of (alternative) proposals
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
This paper uses the language of formal dialectics to explore how argumentation schemes and their cri...
The purpose of the paper is to draw attention to a kind of rational persuasion which has received li...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
This paper proposes a dialectical profile of critical questions attached to the deliberation scheme....
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
From a decision theoretic perspective, arguments stem from decisions made by arguers. Despite some p...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
In the paper I propose conceptions of argument, of uses of argument, and of argumentation that rely ...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
This paper begins a working-through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation sc...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
Our ambition in this paper is to begin to specify in argumentative terms (some of) the steps involv...
In this article I study the constraints and opportunities available to decision-makers in an instit...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
This paper uses the language of formal dialectics to explore how argumentation schemes and their cri...
The purpose of the paper is to draw attention to a kind of rational persuasion which has received li...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
This paper proposes a dialectical profile of critical questions attached to the deliberation scheme....
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
From a decision theoretic perspective, arguments stem from decisions made by arguers. Despite some p...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
In the paper I propose conceptions of argument, of uses of argument, and of argumentation that rely ...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
This paper begins a working-through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation sc...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
Our ambition in this paper is to begin to specify in argumentative terms (some of) the steps involv...
In this article I study the constraints and opportunities available to decision-makers in an instit...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
This paper uses the language of formal dialectics to explore how argumentation schemes and their cri...
The purpose of the paper is to draw attention to a kind of rational persuasion which has received li...